Filed under: Christian, Christianity, General, Relevant Christian, Relevant Life
I am amazed at what we Christians think “the Bible says…” about various subjects!
I recently had a kid tell me that, “the bible says that tattoos are a sin”. Of course this was something that his parents had told him.
So, what does the Bible say about tattoos?
Leviticus 19:23-28 23 “When you enter the land and plant fruit trees, leave the fruit unharvested for the first three years and consider it forbidden.[f] Do not eat it. 24 In the fourth year the entire crop must be consecrated to the Lord as a celebration of praise. 25 Finally, in the fifth year you may eat the fruit. If you follow this pattern, your harvest will increase. I am the Lord your God. 26 “Do not eat meat that has not been drained of its blood. “Do not practice fortune-telling or witchcraft. 27 “Do not trim off the hair on your temples or trim your beards. 28 “Do not cut your bodies for the dead, and do not mark your skin with tattoos. I am the Lord.
In this passage God is speaking to his covenant people Israel. He is specifically telling them to stay far from the religious practices of the surrounding people groups. The prohibited religious practices in these verses include eating bloody meat, fortune telling, certain hair cuts related to the priests of false cults, cutting or marking the body for dead relatives, cultic prostitution and consulting psychics. All these practices would lead God’s beloved people away from Him and toward false gods that were not Gods at all. In the midst of this context we find the word translated “tattoo marks” in verse 28. It is important to note here that the context of this passage is not one of body décor but one of marking one’s self in connection with cultic religious worship. Check out what Bible commentaries tell us much about the eastern religious practices that God was warning His people to shun.
These prohibitions seem to relate to pagan religious customs which should be avoided, including pagan mourning rites (vv. 27-28) Walvoord, J. F., Zuck, R. B., & Dallas Theological Seminary. (1983–c1985). The Bible knowledge commentary: An exposition of the scriptures. Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.
The practice of making deep gashes on the face and arms and legs, in time of bereavement, was universal among the heathen, and it was deemed a becoming mark of respect for the dead, as well as a sort of propitiatory offering to the deities who presided over death and the grave. The Jews learned this custom in Egypt, and though weaned from it, relapsed in a later and degenerate age into this old superstition (Is 15:2; Je 16:6; 41:5). “nor print any marks upon you” (v:28 )—by tattooing, imprinting figures of flowers, leaves, stars, and other fanciful devices on various parts of their person. The impression was made sometimes by means of a hot iron, sometimes by ink or paint, as is done by the Arab females of the present day and the different castes of the Hindus. It it probable that a strong propensity to adopt such marks in honor of some idol gave occasion to the prohibition in this verse; and they were wisely forbidden. Jamieson, R., Fausset, A. R., Fausset, A. R., Brown, D., & Brown, D. (1997). A commentary, critical and explanatory, on the Old and New Testaments. On spine: Critical and explanatory commentary. (Le 19:28). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.
“Make any cuttings in your flesh” (v:28): the reference here is to the practice of making deep gashes in the skin while mourning the death of a relative. This was done to provide life blood for the spirit of the dead person rather than to express sorrow. On account of the dead: as indicated above, this describes the purpose of all the actions in verse 27 as well as verse 28. Péter-Contesse, R., & Ellington. (1992). A handbook on Leviticus. UBS handbooks; Helps for translating (Page 296). New York: United Bible Societies.
The “tattoo” marks described in Leviticus 19:28 were clearly related to false religious practices. The word translated tattoo in our English Bibles is the Hebrew word “qa aqa”, this word appears only one time in the Bible, here in this passage Leviticus. The word “qa aqa” means literally “to cut” but taken with the surrounding words indicates a cutting that left a mark imprinted in the skin. This could have been a form of branding, scarring, cutting or a process where ink was inlaid into the skin; there is not enough data to fully define exactly what this word meant. However we translate the word “qa aqa” though, in this passage, it is certainly used in the context of cultic religious worship. The prohibition against “qa aqa”, (translated tattoo) was to keep the Israelites from being involved or affiliated with cultic worship practices. Plus, I get the sense that it is referring putting the tattoo on yourself… so just make sure you have someone do it for you. (ha, just a little joke there!)
Anyway, the tattoo of today is much different than it was for those who originally received the Pentateuch (the first 5 books of the bible). Today tattoos are a decorative means of self expression and personal decoration. In our current culture people modify their appearance for beauty in many ways such as clothing choice, makeup, plastic surgery, haircutting and coloring, weight loss, body-building, and ear piercing. Some of these practices have a history in ancient ritual and false religion, but in our cultural context they do not denote a connection with evil or false faith. In the same way tattoos today do not link the wearer to cultic worship practices and is not generally practiced for ancient religious purposes, tattoos today are for ornamentation.
Yet another reason to believe Christians are free to tattoo their bodies is that New Testament believers are not bound by the Old Testament laws to gain or regain right relationship with God. If we were to obey the laws of the Old Testament we would also be bound by rules that would restrict shellfish and pork eating, hairstyles, wearing of clothes made from two different fabrics, even eating cheese on hamburgers (yes, it is true). Some also feel that modifying the body somehow defiles God’s creation, but if this was true would it be right to pierce ears, correct a club foot, cut hair, clip nails, get a tan or use orthodontia? Each of the previously mentioned practices modifies the way we were originally created, some permanently. Getting a tattoo is a deeply personal choice that falls in the category of personal appearance and is vitally connected to the freedom of the believer. The Apostle Paul reminds us that the Old Testament Law was designed by God was to lead people toward Jesus. Now that Jesus has come and set us free, we are not under the law for our good standing with God. Our right standing before God comes from placing our trust in Jesus’ death on the cross to pay for our debts, not on following the Old Testament regulations.
Galatians 3:24–25 24 Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith. 25 But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.— NAS
As New Testament followers of Jesus we are not under restriction in the area of personal décor.
Tattoo of today can describe images that merely please the wearer, or have deeper meaning to the owner. Many Christians today are tattooing themselves not in tribute to a false idol or anti-Christian deity, but with love for the one true God and Creator. Many today utilize this permanent marking a way of giving glory to God. Some find that Christian tattoos attract questions about faith and provide opportunities to give God glory by allowing the story-telling of His Love to those who aren’t convinced yet.
Tattoo is a significant life-choice and should be only entered into with a great deal of forethought. Some questions to ask yourself if you are young and considering a tattoo are:
Am I legally of an age to get a tattoo?
If I live with my parents, would my parents support my decision?
Would I be defying the authority God gave my parents over me at my current age?
Would I still want this particular image when I get older?
What if my future mate wouldn’t like having to see this image for a lifetime?
Would this tattoo be in an area of my body that would be plainly visible? – Many people do unfairly judge people with tattoos as being “second-class.”
Would this image bring God glory?
Do I feel fully convinced that tattoos are allowable for Christians?
Tattoo is not for everyone, and is certainly not for a Christian who feels unconvinced that getting a tattoo is completely Biblical. In this and many areas of the Christian life there are many truly excellent believers who have varying degrees of agreement and disagreement about Christians with tattoos. In whatever you believe about this issue I hope that you will leave gracious space for others who might feel differently.
May ALL things bring Glory to our great God, Jesus the Christ.
77 Comments








Timmy, if you played baseball you’d be hitting clean up cuz that was a home run.
Comment by Joe Martino June 30, 2007 @ 8:51 pmSweet. As a Christian who works with teenagers, you do a great job of covering this topic. thanks.
Comment by uncalston June 30, 2007 @ 10:18 pm[...] Read the rest of the piece here Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]
Pingback by Thinking in Progress » » Blog Archive » Tattoos July 1, 2007 @ 10:54 amI want a tattoo but I cant think of anything I want now that I would still want when Im 70. So Im holding out till then.
Comment by dave anderson (moviepastor) July 1, 2007 @ 4:37 pmI getting a crown of thorns around my left bicep. Probably going to do it next month. It is one of those things that I have been thinking about for several years.
Comment by Jimmy July 1, 2007 @ 6:07 pmWhat Does the Bible Say About Tattoos?
Great post. Thanks!
Trackback by new plastic surgery york July 2, 2007 @ 12:28 amWell said…I don’t have a tattoo personally, but I love it when anyone throws down some good biblical exegesis.
Comment by Phillip Santillan July 2, 2007 @ 10:44 amHey just read your info about tatoos.would encourage you to read my blog on it.God Bless.
Comment by Linda Jefferson July 13, 2007 @ 6:02 pmcan be found under my name.
its under bebo.com
Comment by Linda Jefferson July 13, 2007 @ 6:02 pmim so glad u posted this coz im a youht leader in south africa and i tell the young people this but its been drilled in to them that its a sin and some fear they have sinned since they have 1, but uits so cool that i can refer to an outsider who can explain to them plus the internet holds some really weird opinions about the ible and imso glad uve put some truth out there1
Comment by Angelique August 12, 2007 @ 6:37 amthanx
yours truly
angelique^-^
Angelique,
It is our pleasure…..keep the faith!
Comment by Jimmy August 12, 2007 @ 1:12 pmThe Bible doesn’t say not to eat cheese on hamburgers, it says not to boil a young goat in its mother’s milk. The rule against mixing of meat and dairy is a “tradition of man” as the Master would say, and not God’s Eternal Word, as include all the words of the Bible.
Comment by Daniel September 27, 2007 @ 1:08 pmDaniel,
I am confused as to what that has to do with this post…sorry
Comment by Jimmy September 27, 2007 @ 4:25 pmSomething to consider is that this industry is not regulated and some of the ingredients cause cancer and are toxic. I am a believer in the Word of God and I am sure that he wants us to be as healthy as possible. Choose Life!
Comment by Sonia September 28, 2007 @ 11:31 pmcheck out the following website for another POV on the subject…
It is a personal choice and as stated before must be done with careful consideration…
http://bible-knowledge.com/tattoos-body-piercing.html
Comment by Danny October 20, 2007 @ 7:17 amDriscoll likes to point to the verse in Revalation where Jesus comes back tatted up.
Comment by revolution October 26, 2007 @ 8:21 amI got a tattoo of a cross with moth wings, with eyes in it. For me it was a symbolism of what Matt. 5:8 says. I got into a pretty big fight about it with my husband because he said it was wrong, but then he looked at what you said and changed his mind. I am so glad that we don’t argue about it anymore! I also find it fasinating as I was doing some research that Jesus in Rev. 19:20 has King of Kings, and Lord of Lords written on his robe and thigh. I think that means its permanent.
Comment by Betty December 6, 2007 @ 9:03 pmHey Betty…yeah…the tat nay sayers kind of miss that one.
Peace
Comment by Jimmy December 7, 2007 @ 10:25 pmhey thanks for the posts above, very interesting reading and cleared up any doubts i had.
Comment by Ally McIlroy January 10, 2008 @ 6:50 pmI am a born again Chrisitan and i am thinking about getting a tattoo, many people said this was hypocritcal and i never had the evidence to prove them wrong…now i do:)
I was thinking about getting ‘Jesus Wept’ in small lettering just above my wrist. However i am doing alot of thinking of find something that would be suitable. Does anyone know of anyone with a verse (i think i would prefer that, than compared to say a cross of thorns etc)
any help would be greatly appreciated
Sorry Ally…I don’t know of anyone with a verse on them.
I have a friend who has “king of kings” in greek.
Comment by Jimmy January 10, 2008 @ 10:23 pm[...] What Does The Bible Say About Tattoos? / Author: Timmy Gibson 2. No Apology Necessary / Author: Jimmy Eldridge 3. Why Christians Suck / [...]
Pingback by Top 5 Posts for 2007 « Relevant Christian Blog February 6, 2008 @ 8:49 pmAlly,
Comment by Emily February 8, 2008 @ 1:13 amI am going to soon get “James 1:2″ either on my foot or ankle. I have dealt with a lot of physical diseases in my short 24 years of life and that verse has always helped me keep my focus! Just some insite for ya!
[...] The best information on the topic can be found at the source here [...]
Pingback by Bibles and Airports » What Does the Bible Say About Tattoos? Relevant Christian Blog March 11, 2008 @ 8:52 amI’m not prepared to call tattoos a sin – but I’m also not prepared to suggest that Christ’s lettering in Revelation is a tattoo either – scripture simply says it’s written there.
Comment by john May 19, 2008 @ 2:07 pmI would caution young people to carefully consider WHY they are getting a tattoo. I know it’s a fad and trendy, but we must guard our effectiveness as a witness. Christ commands us not to fall in love with the world or the things of the world, and sometimes our ‘need’ to fit in will cause us to make choices for the wrong reasons.
Self-expression is fine – but if you are only able to express yourself by marking your skin or in your outward appearance – then your expression is pretty shallow to begin with. Yes – I think the same thing for those who think wearing a Christian t-shirt is their act of “witnessing”
Again – I’m not calling it a sin – I’m just urging you to be careful about a decision that is usually permanent.
John,
Good advice. I don’t think anyone should get a tattoo without carefully…and prayerfully…considering what they are about to do.
Comment by Jimmy May 19, 2008 @ 3:14 pmHi,
Thank you.I have felt strongly about getting a verse Jer 29.11 on my wrist. My mum passed away and that is the promise that has caused my being to keep standing. I wanted something to continuosly remind me of that .
Have a blessed day.
Comment by Krishnee June 24, 2008 @ 2:27 amI was just looking up the word “vesture” as said in Rev. 19:16 and it is described as a cloak or garment. So, could it just mean that it was written on his garmet that covers his thigh, not actually on his thigh?
Comment by Lindsay July 2, 2008 @ 6:50 pmI am just trying to figure out exactly how I feel about tattoos. I have one that I got when I was 18 and am now regretting it because I am scared of it’s consequences. It says in the Bible that any man who marks his body will be destroyed….
I don’t think that Christians should get tattoos and I do believe that the Bible speaks about it indirectly. When God first created human beings he called it good and we were created in his beautiful image. Why would we want to change what he created? Also, the Bible talks about how our bodies are temples of God. Putting tattoos on yourself is like putting graffitti on God’s temple. The Bible also speaks about modesty in the New Testament so as not to draw attention to ourselves. Don’t tattoos and piercings draw attention to ourselves? Tattooing has it’s roots in witchcraft, as stated in the Bible, so why would we partake in an act that has roots in witchcraft? The Bible says that in every action we take we should do it to glorify God, so you have to ask yourself if you’re really glorifying God by marking up the beautiful body that he created for you.
Comment by Liz August 11, 2008 @ 1:58 pmLiz,
I also don’t think Christians should be allowed to vote…..because the majority of Christians will only vote for a Republican candidate or one that claims to be a Christian, and not based on the candidates track record or qualifications…that is my personal opinion however.
Timmy gave scriptures to back his stance on the subject.
If you can state scripture for your stance it will make your argument much stronger.
Comment by Jimmy August 12, 2008 @ 7:15 amLiz,
Comment by J. C. it is just a coincidence August 14, 2008 @ 4:10 pmYou wrote that God made us in His beautiful image, and we should not change what he created. Why does no one confront the 50 year-old women who dye their hair? It is not modest. It dyes their scalp for a day or two which violates the King James translation of Leviticus 19:28 which says not to “…print any marks upon you”. Furthermore, why are we allowing the same women to wear makeup and nail polish if they are to be modest?
I am not writing this merely to criticize and argue, but merely to point out that we as a Christian body tend to only stand in the face of those who are different. I have yet to hear of a grass roots movement to make junkfood illegal because it violates the word of God in 1 Corinthians 6:19. Is it hypocritical to point out a tattoo on someone at church and tell them it is a sin, but not point out the overweight attendees as well?
God bless all of you who feel that tattoos are wrong. You have a right to your opinion, but I beg that you examine if your strong convictions are based on what the Bible has to say or if it is based on social pressure to conform.
After the birth of our first child I wanted to show my husband that I loved him. I was also going through a phase where I didn’t feel attractive. I decided to get a small heart tattooed on my hip with my husband’s initials in it. He is the only one that can see. No one knows I have a tattoo unless I tell them. I have only told a few people I have it and they are always so surprised because I am modest, not real outgoing, mother of 3. I wanted this to show my husband that I will always love him, even when I can’t physically show him. There are Christians that have tattoos and there are people that got theirs before they became a Christian. One of the saddest things I’ve ever heard was an older Christian gentleman making a comment about a young guy that had tatts all over him. I simply made a comment back that maybe no one had ever told the young man about Jesus and that he had died for him too. I will tell you that my dad has tattoos and he has gone to jails before to witness. He told me that he was told there were certain inmates who would not talk to him. He was actually able to talk to them was because of his tattoos. They wanted to talk to someone ‘like them’. My dad’s tattoos are not gaudy, but they were enough to open the door. For the people who are talking about our bodies being temples, yes, they are but how many of you put caffeine (which is addictive), bacon and other fatty meats (which clog arteries), etc into your temple today? Would you be like the Pharisees and forbid Jesus to do miracles on the Sabbath? Most people are not tolerant of Christians because of legalistic religiosity. I admit I am not very tolerant of those Christians myself.
Comment by Mary Kay August 25, 2008 @ 3:22 pmMary Kay,
Thank you for sharing. Some good points.
Comment by Jimmy August 25, 2008 @ 8:18 pmAll of my life I have been taught that the commandments of Noah and Moses in the Old Testament are for our learning. I have been taught that the coming of Christ, in particular, his death for our sins, freed us from the law. I was taught that we live in the administration or dispensation of Grace now, and once we confess Christ, as long as we ask for forgiveness for our sins and we are truly repentant in our hearts, then, we are covered by the Blood of Jesus.
Comment by Melissa September 18, 2008 @ 2:53 pmAs for the current topic… There are many different schools of thought on whether its right or wrong for a Christian to get a tattoo. The truth is, we were all given free will choice. The decision is the individual’s. Personally, I like tattoos. I’ve wanted one for years, but because God stated ONCE in His Word that he didn’t want it done, I won’t get one. That is MY choice. I do not care about why He said don’t do it. I only care that He did. Besides, I haven’t seen anywhere in the NT where He changed His mind! Yes! Paul said we were freed from the law, but that doesn’t mean we are free to go out there and sin at will and justify it with random passages and verses of scripture. That’s called private interpretation and God said not to do that too. My ultimate question to myself was, who do I want to please more? Who is it that I worship? Who is it that I serve? God, or me? To me, there is no question of whether its a sin or not. If God told them not to do that, then it was a sin then, and its still a sin now. I am by no means perfect or sin free! I just believe, that its up to us as Christians to decide whether the consequences are those we don’t mind dealing with. Tattooing could result in sickness, disease, or even death. If that’s the risk you want to take, then God bless you and be with you!
I actually disagree with you premise. For one thing, there is no indication in the Bible that this law no longer applies (nor the opposite). Also, the tattoo is still used now as a pagan religious practice among Hindus (as you pointed out), certain island nations (like Samoa), etc. so why does it no longer apply? Now 1 Cor 6:19 is specifically referring to sexual sin, but I noticed one thing. It refers to sexual immorality as a sin in/against the body. Tattooing involves placing a foreign substance in the body and so can be seen the same way. It’s not much different from placing a Baal statue in Solomon’s Temple which is foreign to the temple. Just as a prostitute is often referred to as a foreign (or “strange”) woman. Another thing, There is the command against worrying about outer adornament (Mat 6:31; 1 Pet 3:3). Tattooing is a form of adornment and is quite often a source of pride (even for a Christian with one). It can become an idol. It can even be a form of false spirituality (“I feel closer to Jesus with this tattoo”). I got curious about why there is no mention of tattoos in the New Testament. So I looked up tattoos and their relation to the Roman Empire. The Romans were against tattooing. T
Comment by Danny September 23, 2008 @ 9:14 pmExcuse me. I’m typing on a laptop and it is hard to miss the touch pad while typing. Anyway, They considered tattooing as that of the barbarians (Egyptians, Skandinavians, etc.). So there was no reason to speak against tattooing because the Romans and Jews were in agreement on that. I noticed another thing. There is a sin that is only mentioned once in the New Testament and only when it was committed by someone in the church (1 Cor 5:1). It is referred to as a sin “that is not tolerated even among pagans.” The sin is incest with one’s step-mother. Many people today would only associate incest as with blood relatives, but the Bible includes “step” relatives (Lev 18:8). I read through the entire bible every year and have not yet found any other verse in the New Testament that speaks of this sin. That is because it was a sin “that is not tolerated even among pagans.” So one would not often see it committed just as one would not often see tattooing done in that culture. I doubt that I have convinced you of this, but I hope you would consider looking alittle deeper into this. God Bless.
Comment by Danny September 23, 2008 @ 9:29 pmThank you so much I love the way the subject of tattoos was presented. I have been pondering this subject and researching it. I have 2 and would like to get one of a cross and a rainbow. I am a Christian and an artist, I consider tattoos as just that art. I love the Lord. Tattoos are not idols to me, and I do also eat my meat rare.
Comment by Nancy Kuker September 25, 2008 @ 8:56 amPraise Jesus for the New Testament
I’ve read all of these posts and have done my own research on tatooing. I struggle with many of the comments. I’m in a different position then most of you. My husband and I pastor a church. As Pastors, we took a stand on tatoos regarding our leadership (elders, pastors, deacons). We asked that once they decided to become a leader within our fellowship we ask that they not get any new tatoos as long as they were under our leadership. Five years ago we received no objections. Just to clarify, it wasn’t just tatooing, there was also body piercing except for ears as well as smoking, drinking and other actions that we felt would not benefit the body of Christ and could cause a young believer to stumble. Now this subject has come up again and with a vengence. I caution all of you who are embrassing this controversal subject to understand that as Pastors we are accountable to God for how we lead, teach and direct. I would rather lead people as far away from the cliff (sin) then to see how close we can get and not fall over. Is it a question of right or wrong? Maybe, but how about a question of stay as far away from the world and love Jesus so that our light may shine. It also says to be “separate from the world”.
I have lots of friends who have tatoos. They got them when they were in the world and some got them when they were saved. Isn’t it odd how a subject like this can be such a division to God’s people. To me that is a clue.
There are lots of commands from the old testament that are not mentioned in the new testaments that we as a society still follow. I personally think this is one we should honor.
Comment by Dana September 28, 2008 @ 4:35 pmDana,
Comment by Joe Martino September 28, 2008 @ 6:33 pmI want to preface my comment with this: You are entitled to lead any way that you want to lead and you should do what your conscience dictates. Having said that, your idea of leading people as far away from the cliff is exactly the reason the Pharisee created extra rules that weren’t in the Bible. The stumbling issue is also an interesting expression. What is the tatoo causing them to stumble? If the tattoo is a heart, or a cross or something else, how else is the tattoo causing someone to stumble. What sin is it causing them to commit? I agree that the divisive factor is interesting, yet it is you and your husband who are in essense being divisive by adding rules to Scripture for your elders. You are in effect, drawing a line that the Bible does not draw.
I realize my words may make you angry, if that is the case I want to apologize.
Wow, adding rules to scripture. Is that what it means to truly want to follow God’s word and not embrase the world and its ideas. I’ve never posted on a website before and I now know why. I’m assuming you are not a pastor or called to pastor.
I think I’ll just stick with what God says. And you are right. I will stand before God and account for every word that I preach. That is what the Bible says about those called as Pastors.
Comment by Dana September 28, 2008 @ 10:50 pmDana, Dana, Dana,
Relax. I was disagreeing with you. I am an ordained minister and have been a pastor in the past. Perhaps, thicker skin is in order? No I am not currently a pastor in vocational ministry if that is what you are asking. Yes, I believe you are adding to Scripture by your rules. No where is there a rule in found in the NT about elders having tatoos. Now, you are entitled to your conviction and you can have your rules based on your convictions but let us be honest with each other and state that is all that it is; a conviction.
Your implication that people who don’t want to follow your conviction don’t actually want to follow God’s word is disturbing. Simply because we don’t agree with you in this area doesn’t mean that we are embracing the world. That’s not dialogue, that’s character assassination. I hope and pray you don’t attack those whom you are called to shepherd and serve when they disagree with you as you have here.
Comment by Joe Martino September 29, 2008 @ 8:19 pmGrace and Peace
Romans 14… Read and ponder.
Comment by Ashley October 1, 2008 @ 10:12 pmExcellent point, Ashley
Comment by Joe Martino October 3, 2008 @ 7:53 amWell…
There’s a lot of good pros and cons throughout all of these responses and they all make you think. I do not specifically like one more than the other but look at all of the responses in an objective fashion. In regards to Ashley’s response about Romans 14, I read it and within my study bible in regards to verse 1 – accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters.
Now, there are and always will be disputable matters between all those who are Christians and follow God. Especially when there is a little evidence, both pro and con, for whatever matter Christians are arguing on. Anyway, the study bible I have makes it a point to explain that first verse by saying “Fellowship among Christians is not to be based on everyone’s agreement on disputable questions. Christians do not agree on all matters pertaining to the Christian life, NOR DO THEY NEED TO.”
Chapter 14 also incorporates the usage of stong/weak faith in terms of how much one understands faith in context with the real world. And this is one aspect as to why there may or may not be disputes on a subject matter, such as tattoos vs food types in this chapter. It also talks about how the strong and weak christians must respect each other because NEITHER is master over the other but God is master of all and as someone stated, we all answer to God, both now and when we are judged after death. It goes on to talk about doing something to cause your brother to stumble, and as someone stated, whether or not tattooing is a modern pagan thing to do against God or not, if it doesn’t cause your brother/sister to stumble because the tattoo is representing Jesus/God/Christianity… then well, it’s not all bad if you view tattooing to be bad.
Further, Paul mentions that the food rules no longer apply, but in any bible verse we must look at it first in the context of that time, and then transfer the understanding we receive to the present time. And that’s hard, plus the fact that the bible mentions numerous times that our God is so great that a lot of things we cant and wont understand about him… this includes many of the things I think Christians argue about today. We were built simply to do one thing, worship the Lord our God.
Thus, instead of always finding a way to argue and be seperate, we shouldnt ever forget that all who believe ( everyone in the WORLD) represents the body of Christ. We cant let minute differences plague God’s mission of spreading his love. Arguing doesnt promote unity, community, etc. Now, debating and great in depth discussions are another that one could argue, heh, is similar to how some people actually argue. The obvious difference is that despite the various opinions/perspectives on all life has to offer, if we remember we worship/follow the same God, I dont think we can go wrong. Afterall, we’ll sin till the day we die, all of us, and God’s OK with that, we should be too. PLus, all the difference perspectives/opinions I think represent the diverse and unique creation/mind God has when making all of us 7 billion people and much more to come in the future… good stuff to celebrate.
Further about disputes… it says that “such matters, decisions should be guided by conscience.” And it also says, “Not to generalize to mean that sin is only a matter of subjective opinion or conscience.” It mentions that Christ died for the weak Christians – those that didnt believe or had a hard time seeing the light, and that we strong christians should at least be willing to adjust our own behavior so as to attract and bring in those weak Christians. THAT is an interesting angle, I think, to ponder when considering tattoos and Christianity.
Here are some really good key points -
“To be concerned with such trivial matters is to miss completely the essence of Christian living.”
“To exercise freedom without responsibility can lead to evil results.”
(def) Mutual Edification – the spiritual building up of individual christians and of the church.
Here’s and awesome perspective to consider:
The weak Christian who as a redeemed person is God’s work and in whom God continues to work. Paul recognizes a strong Christian’s right ot certain freedoms, but qualifies it with the principle of regard for a weak Christian’s scruples. Strong Christians are not required to go against their convictions or change their standards. Yet they are not to flaunt their Christian freedom but keep it private. Here the conviction of one’s action is in keeping with God’s will.
Now Paul identifies himself with strong Christians whose personal convictions allow more freedom than the weak. Not merely to tolerate or put up with but to uphold LOVINGLY (failings – not sins). Since (in the context of food eating in Chapter 14) is not a sin and the scriptures have no clear guidance upon it.
And a choice there is to decide if tattooing and other matters of faith can be transfered over to be in the context of being a Christian.
My hope is that people will read this and understand God’s most strongest desire to LOVE people and have his body, US, do that for him, because he’ll LOVE us no matter what we do in life, as long as we follow him. It’s all about unity, not separation.
Comment by Sean October 19, 2008 @ 10:30 pmJesus would have never spent time or money getting a tattoo for himself. Instead He would have spent His time and money on the needy and poor. If you are wanting a tattoo to represent Jesus because of His importance in your life, it is inconsistent to what He would have done.
Comment by Andrew November 24, 2008 @ 7:29 pm^ “Jesus would have never spent time or money getting a tattoo for himself.”
?
Comment by Gods Girl December 12, 2008 @ 3:27 amREVELATION 19:16
“… and on his thigh he has a name inscribed, King of kings and Lord of lords.”
Salvation comes to us thru our response to the gospel. It takes a change of heart towards GOD. And repentance. What i thought was right and acceptable before i met JESUS has changed over time. Be very careful when considering all things permenant. love in CHRIST!
Comment by Jason W December 19, 2008 @ 10:41 amin response to Joe, i think what dana is saying, is that people, especially those young in Christ, may see tattoos or other actions comparable to other actions which are often termed as unchristian-like. Also, i work with youth, and in a position where kids may look up to me (as unworthy as i am) i must be careful as to what i encourage them to do. would my visible tattoo justify getting a tattoo against their parent’s veiws? perhaps it would- in which case, getting a tattoo when in a position of leadership could be seen as a bad idea. because a tattoo is often grouped among a certain lifestyle- opening up a door of reasoning in a person’s mind should be avoided. However, i do believe it is insanely important for us to not judge, and let the holy spirit convict us ourselves.
God bless!
Comment by ashley January 3, 2009 @ 1:25 pmI can’t believe how all us Christians may sound to unbelievers. Using a God Bless or any other Christianese after we insult eachother. How about NO ONE knows the answer. Unless God Himself came down and told you personally. We will be judged for tattoos and a lot more on the day we arrive in Heaven. I think whether you get one or not should be based on your convictions and no one elses. Peoples convictions won’t ever be the same because we all come from different backgrounds, have different experiences and are all on a different place in our relationship w/ our Savior. I am a Christian w/ a tattoo and I may regret it later, like the time I was speeding and broke a law of the land and got a ticket, or I may not regret it when I’m older. We are not perfect by any means and never will be. We can’t be. There are so many other things to worry about. Tattoos should be the least of them.
Comment by Marisa January 8, 2009 @ 3:13 pmWell said Marisa….well said!
Comment by Jimmy January 8, 2009 @ 6:59 pmI’m 18yrs old. Today I am going in to get my first tattoo. It’s a key with the trinity symbol and infinity/eternity symbol incorporated into it. In the middle of the key I put Matt. 16-19, For i have given you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. I just re-committed my life to Christ, the tattoo shows symbolic meaning that I have been given the keys to the kingdom. That God has given me a key to His house. It shows my permanent commitment to God. That I will forever be in heaven with The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit.
Comment by Haylie Burns January 15, 2009 @ 12:48 pmWow.
I came upon this quite accidentally, but I am absolutely flabbergasted at the dismissive justification here… I mean, quite nearly slack-jawed.
“Anyway, the tattoo of today is much different than it was for those who originally received the Pentateuch (the first 5 books of the bible)”
This seems like the same kind of rationale that homosexual defenders use, by citing the horde mentality of the Sodomites, or the Roman use of catamite boys, or other homosexual practices of the day, etc. etc. I’m pretty sure homosexuality is much different today than it was for those who originally received the Word, too (Not that I track this kind of thing, but I haven’t heard too much lately about roving hordes of homos coursing through the streets to demand access to anyone’s houseguests). So is it your suggestion that we submit to or dismiss biblical guidance according to contemporary trends?
“If we were to obey the laws of the Old Testament we would also be bound by rules that would restrict shellfish and pork eating, hairstyles, wearing of clothes made from two different fabrics, even eating cheese on hamburgers….Our right standing before God comes from placing our trust in Jesus’ death on the cross to pay for our debts, not on following the Old Testament regulations.”
Uhhh…. forgive me if I am missing something that differentiates this rationale from self-serving cherry-picking. Not to get stuck on it as the countervailing example, but by this logic, not only should Christians be ALLOWED to be homosexual, perhaps ONLY Christians should be allowed to be homosexual, because they are relieved of The Law by virtue of their faith in Christ, whereas the Jews better stick to The Law.
Let’s get the cheeseburgers (mixing meat and dairy) out of the way… that’s not even from the Bible. The prohibition against mixing meat and dairy is an extrapolation of rabbinic law, rather than divine law developed in the tradition of “building a fence around the Torah,” essentially, taking the word of God and devising a bunch of more stringent and specific rules around THAT, so as to help prevent accidental violations of God’s law. The Law itself actually only refers to cooking goats, not all meats or all milks, or any meats with any milks. Cooking the young of any species in its mother’s milk seems detestable, even barbaric, but to have extrapolated the goat-cooking rule to mean that we should not eat a turkey and swiss sandwich seems a bit extreme. But yours is the logic that a lot of modern Jews use for not observing the dietary laws, kind of a “that was then, this is now” kind of thinking. At least fundamentalist Jews who condemn homosexuality are being consistent in their tradition by taking the actual word of God and adding prohibitions on top of it as a failsafe. (I simply cannot understand the Christian rationale for deciding that homosexuality is such a big deal, while going virtually silent on, say, adultery or divorce, which are OBVIOUSLY much bigger threats to the wellness of the family unit.)
But back to tattoos… what part of “shall not” is unclear here? It’s a simple verse. Really, really simple. Don’t do this, and don’t do that; I am the Lord. Thank you, drive thru. By what standard do you decide which sins Christ’s sacrifice was meant to cover, and which it was not? I just don’t get it.
Comment by ae February 2, 2009 @ 1:48 amUh…AE…What?
In your parting shot you say “.. what part of “shall not” is unclear here? It’s a simple verse. Really, really simple. Don’t do this, and don’t do that; I am the Lord. Thank you, drive thru.”
What the heck are you talking about? Did I miss something?
Please enlighten me.
Comment by Jimmy February 2, 2009 @ 3:30 pmLeviticus 19:28 (New American Standard Bible)
You shall not make any cuts in your body for the dead nor make any tattoo marks on yourselves: I am the LORD.
Comment by ae February 5, 2009 @ 1:50 amYes, and in the verse directly before that, “Do not trim off the hair on your temples or trim your beards.” I’m thinking that either God was referring to avoiding doing things for pagan purposes, or several people I saw at Wal-Mart today aren’t going to heaven.
Comment by Lan February 6, 2009 @ 6:40 pmOr what about verse 19…” ‘Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material.”….how many of us are doing that right this very minute?
Comment by Jimmy February 6, 2009 @ 7:40 pmNow Lan and Jimmy,
Comment by Joe February 7, 2009 @ 8:56 amHere’s the problem; you are looking for a consistent Biblical interpretation, but people who argue against Tattoos cannot do that. The arguments become illogical or poorly contrived when that happens.
What’s poorly contrived, Joe? There’s one verse in the bible that addresses it, and it’s a SHALL NOT, so there’s no usual thorny problem of internal inconsistency. I do think it’s interesting how we come up with rationalizations for dismissing the rules we no longer find relevant or helpful, but indulge broad and generous interpretations for the ones we want to knock someone else upside the head with. My guess is… let’s see… you’ve had a little ink done? You probably don’t wait seven days for relations after your wife has her menses, either.
I’m not hacking at you personally. I’m totally wearing cotton-rayon blends and I don’t keep the sabbath and while I don’t have tattoos, I do eat me a little swordfish now and then, and those babies don’t have fins and scales and apparently the Lord finds them detestable, or an abomination, or some such thing. I pick and choose as much as the next person. We are hypocritical and judgmental and we love other people’s sins. If we put one-fifth of the energy into suppressing adultery–one of God’s Top Ten, okay?– that we put into suppressing homosexuality, now THAT would be some meaningful protection of family and marriage. But hmmmm…. can’t seem to recall the last time I heard about a big anti-cheating rally or any legislation to make sure that cheaters don’t get the same rights as people who divorce for other reasons, or any other kind of social sanction for that matter. Why not? It causes tremendous destruction in homes and families, breaks hearts and often leads to divorce, which is a socio-economic disaster for women and children in particular! Yeah, but it’s OUR sin. We LIKE that sin. If the statistics are correct, just more than half of married people of both genders cheat. Yeah, so we probably won’t be seeing any of that legislation coming up…
Lan, sometimes God gave His reasoning and sometimes He didn’t. I don’t presume to know what He was thinking. I think part of his point was to be arbitrary just to establish a baseline of compliance. But we want to come up with all this latter-day rationalization for Him, like pork caused trichonosis and red tide made shellfish toxic and haircuts and tattoos were pagan. Maybe he just picked some random things and said these I like for you and these I don’t, I am the Lord. I mean, what about circumcision? Hullo? That will sure separate you from some of His other peoples, but doesn’t it seem more like the kind of thing that pagans WOULD do? Yikes! A
Comment by ae February 7, 2009 @ 7:07 pmAE,
Comment by Joe February 8, 2009 @ 12:08 pmYou ask a question then seem to answer it for me. To use that verse as applicable today and maintain a consistent hermeneutical position is impossible or would require one to start killing disobedient children.
God gave Isreal commands that He did not give to the Church in the New Testament. As has been pointed out, that verse is smack dab in the middle of a bunch of others.
Those verses had to do with Israel, and many were given to them on how to properly run a country or differentiate themselves from other nations.
It’s poor use of the text to trot one verse out as a proof text like that.
I’m not hacking at you, I’m just hacking at that system of interpreting Scripture. Not only is it wrong, it’s dangerous.
Yes it is, Joe. I’m supposed to be operating under the old agreement, though, so I do find it odd when Christians, who have a different covenant, site The Law as authority. As I noted, if the new deal is faith in Jesus, then why all the wrangling about what the original text does or doesn’t say?
That said, I do realize that it’s helpful as a guide, even with Jesus’ sacrifice. The Law is full of guidance that steers people toward more ethical and less self-serving behavior. Yes, I agree that all these arbitrary mundane rules are about making Israel distinguish itself from others not only in the ethical issues, but in little day to day ways that keep us REMINDED that we are supposed to be acting differently. It’s a “mind the pennies and the dollars take care of themselves” approach. And insofar as that is always useful, then I guess the law provides good guidance for anyone.
But if you really–I mean REALLY– get your salvation through faith in Jesus, I don’t see what difference it would make to some Christians whether other Christians get tattoos or the wrong haircut or be gay, for that matter. That stuff is of the Law, not of faith. It’s hypocritical blibber-blabber… except insofar as the Law is used as a guide, and that’s where I see so much self-serving picking and choosing and tearing of hair and gnashing of teeth over someone else’s sin’s. My sister is seriously orthodox and tries to live by the Law–all of it. I have the highest regard for the discipline that takes, but in a lot of ways, she has it easier. It’s like here are the rules. Follow them. And then all the rabbinical fence-building on top of it.
I pick and choose. I am hoping I’m not damned because of it, and hoping that at least some kind of awareness of my hypocrisy and a slow, gradual effort to be more and more compliant will make me acceptable before I die. But I don’t know. And all my life, I keep going back to the Christians and praying to Jesus to see if I can get the same deal, and I’m not kidding, I’ve had dreams where he very kindly but firmly tells me to run along and go back to my people and the Law. Maybe it’s one of those “many are called, few are chosen” things. JC obviously doesn’t want me yet. So I admit it–I have Jesus Envy. I don’t have any right answers, but I darn sure keep coming up with questions. Sometimes they’re more about one thing than the other. And I’m pretty sure that if I don’t stay plugged into the conversation somewhere, I’ll start operating totally on self-will and that’s not gonna be pretty. So, fallible as we all are, I like to hang with the Christians that are working on it, and the Jews that are working on it, and just not ever get to thinking I have it figured out and some general level of ethical humanism is enough. Maybe God really, really cares about me knowingly eating swordfish and as one of His Chosen People, I’m gonna be in big trouble some day. I just know I’m falling short right now, and I don’t have Jesus working on my behalf. But I do keep checking in with him. Ya never know… I might get chosen again someday.
Comment by ae February 8, 2009 @ 4:48 pmAE,
Comment by Joe February 8, 2009 @ 5:45 pmI’m not even sure where to begin…
Yeah, I know. It’s okay. Some days I think it would be so much simpler to get saved, but I have an open heart and a hungry soul, and either I’m really supposed to stick –however brokenly– to the path I’ve been given because he doesn’t want me, or maybe I just don’t want him enough. I don’t get it, because I keep coming back and it’s just not happening. And then I look at all y’all Christians fighting and squabbling amongst yourselves as much as us Jews ever did and still do, and I wonder if Jesus really did make it any simpler. I don’t know.
Sundays are always thorny for me. Sorry to spill my guts like that.
Comment by ae February 8, 2009 @ 6:22 pmAE,
Comment by Joe February 9, 2009 @ 9:54 amDude, don’t be sorry about spilling your guts. This is just where blogging is maddeningly inadequate for some real dialogue.
i agree. spot on! very understandable and straight forward!
Comment by jess February 12, 2009 @ 11:21 pmi really like the way u put this…i was reasearching online the passage of where it talks about tattoos…and i couldn’t find it and then this website came up……and pretty much it comes down to personal conviction i believe…..just like alot of things….right on! God bless!:)
Comment by D.G. March 19, 2009 @ 10:41 amWonderful information but you realize that Jesus is a mighty god but not Almighty god our creator?(John 17:3) At John 20:17 (1 Corinthians 8:6, JB) John 8:17, 18(Mark 10:18,(John 5:19, (John 7:16John 6:38(Luke 20:9-16Acts 4:23, 27, 30(Matthew 3:16, 17)(Luke 4:18) (Matthew 20:23,(Luke 22:42) (Mark 15:34(Luke 23:46If he were God, then Habakkuk 1:12 is wrong when it says: “O my God, my Holy One, you do not die.” But the Bible says that Jesus did die and was unconscious in the tomb. And who resurrected Jesus from the dead? If he was truly dead, he could not have resurrected himself. On the other hand, if he was not really dead, his pretended death would not have paid the ransom price for Adam’s sin. But he did pay that price in full by his genuine death. So it was “God [who] resurrected [Jesus] by loosing the pangs of death.” (Acts 2:24) The superior, God Almighty, raised the lesser, his servant Jesus, from the dead.
Comment by marabel April 1, 2009 @ 2:06 am(Mark 13:32Hebrews 5:8 that Jesus “learned obedience from the things he suffered.” Can we imagine that God had to learn anything? No, but Jesus did, for he did not know everything that God knew. And he had to learn something that God never needs to learn—obedience. God never has to obey anyoneThe revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him.” (Revelation 1:1, RS, Catholic edition) If Jesus himself were part of a Godhead, would he have to be given a revelation by another part of the Godhead—God? Surely he would have known all about it, for God knew. But Jesus did not know, for he was not God.”God exalted this one [Jesus] . . . to his right hand.” (Acts 5:31) Paul said: “God exalted him to a superior position.” (Philippians 2:9) If Jesus had been God, how could Jesus have been exalted, that is, raised to a higher position than he had previously enjoyed? He would already have been an exalted part of the Trinity. If, before his exaltation, Jesus had been equal to God, exalting him any further would have made him superior to God.
ust before being stoned to death, the martyr Stephen “gazed into heaven and caught sight of God’s glory and of Jesus standing at God’s right hand.” (Acts 7:55) Clearly, he saw two separate individuals—but no holy spirit, no Trinity Godhead.
Revelation 4:8 to 5:7, God is shown seated on his heavenly throne, but Jesus is not. He has to approach God to take a scroll from God’s right hand. This shows that in heaven Jesus is not God but is separate from him”After that will come the end, when he [Jesus in heaven] will hand over the kingdom to God the Father . . . Then the Son himself will be subjected to the One who has subjected everything to him, so that God may be all in all.”—1 Corinthians 15:24, 28, (1 Corinthians 11:3John 14:28,
Hi Marabel.
Comment by Joe April 2, 2009 @ 6:18 pmWhat about where Jesus says “I and the father are one”?
I am 49 this year and have always wanted a tattoo but never known exactly what i wanted. Last week it came to me and I want a dove of peace with interlinked alpha and omega symbols to symbolise my relationship with Jesus and the work of the holy spirit in my life. It is just for me and will be small and on my inner wrist where it can be covered if needed. Its a personal thing and a reminder of what God has done in my life but as a christian i wanted to ensure that there was no major issue with doing this from a biblical sense. Everything else aside…and there have been some excellent points of view…it comes down to my relationship with God and my prayers on the subject. I think we can get carried away by the law and lose the spirit of the issue. In all we do we should be glorifying God and to do this we should be in constant communication with him and examine our motives in all things. Sometimes we will be wrong as we are human but in the end its a personal thing between me and God. So i say follow the KISS principle…Keep It Simple, Stupid. (no offence meant and i am not calling anyone stupid its just a management principle).
God bless
Comment by Anne April 18, 2009 @ 4:43 pmthanks for this enlightment, i was planning for a tattoo in summer then a friend told me, ‘dont you know it is ungodly’ then i asked ‘how’ but he couldnt explain, but i will save this page for him to see himself, now i am considering to write bodly on my back ‘JESUS SAVES’. thanks again
Comment by samuel April 27, 2009 @ 4:23 pmprobably the greatest article on tattoos, I have ever seen, definitely opened my eyes up to a different biblical perspective that I am used to. Thanks
Comment by steve April 29, 2009 @ 12:15 pmI’m not one to comment often but I found this site after researching tattoos. For the person who dragged in tattoos compared with homosexuality…..are you serious? It is comparing apples with oranges. The debate with tattoos is that in the OT it discusses not doing it with reguardes to rituals and the fact that there is no mention of it in the NT but does discuss that we are under the new law. To some they feel that their faith and just what it means to be a christian allows them to have tattoos(which I personally don’t have a problem with). Homosexuality IS CLEARLY SPOKEN AGAINST in the NT. There is no wiggle room there.
Comment by Lee May 9, 2009 @ 11:01 amWell one thing, I will not try to persuade anyone not to get a tattoo or to get one. On account I mean we as people have the right to make our own decisions and we are judged on the kind of choices we make in different circumstances. I will encourage you all to read your Bible and recieve an understanding of what it means to you. Be salty.(Matthew 5:13, Mark 9:50,) And get your own understanding (Proverbs 3:5) and don’t be a fool Proverbs tell us to get our knowledge and don’t be affraid of it.
Comment by Age 17 AR June 3, 2009 @ 7:52 amHey i really like the way you covered the issue of tattoos. I myself have one and I did do research before and after i decided to get one, but my question is a bit different on the thought of tattoos when it comes to death. My best friend recently passed away in a car wreck and I want to get a tattoo to remember her by. I know i have her in my heart and mind but a tattoo is something I would like to do to remember her. Is it a sin to have a tattoo in remembrance of her with or without her name one it? It is something i’d like to do but I do not want to sin against God if the bible say’s it is wrong. Can you get back to me on it? Thanks!
Comment by Kami June 4, 2009 @ 5:15 pmGreeting Everyone
The topic of Tattoos, was just discussed in my house. I know that tattoos were forbidden in the Old Testament, which is the Law. Many say because Jesus died for our sin, that we are no longer bound to the law. But I beg to differ, Jesus stated himself in Matthew 5:17-18; Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the Law till all is fulfilled. So individuals research the scriptures further, before they state Tattoos was under the Law.
Comment by TONYA June 4, 2009 @ 11:13 pmIm not english so i hope u understand me well .
I believe in Jezus and God and i have tattoo’s
Most people here say why should u change something that God created .But ladyz think about this God Created also women. and women got also hair on there chest/face(mustang) legs , ass not all but most do. and almost all of u ladyz keep shaving/plucking/laser it away . Why should u do arent u happy how god Created u ?
Everbody also me is saying stuff what u cant do and what u can but we all do things that we are not suppose to do . The human brain is making us doing all this stuff its the evolution its how we see things how we experience things on Tv or in life. Nobody is living 100% how the bible wants it because The human brain changes everything thats how we made , God gave us a brain 2 do new stuff 2 make the world better for our farfarfar children . Just think about some hundred years ago they didnt even know what a Car/Pc was how easy things can go if human use their brain . if u get old ur skin is getting ”ugly” so what does a tattoo change on that in Gods eyes. I dont think that u go with ur body to the life after this , a 90 year old skin isnt that beauty 2 have in heaven wouldnt u think ? so the tattoo will vanish also. Sorry for my bad english hope u understand me a little
Comment by Timmie June 13, 2009 @ 11:31 pmMt 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy THE LAW, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Comment by CWhite June 17, 2009 @ 7:41 amMt 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from THE LAW, till all be fulfilled.
We most certainly are STILL held responsible for what we teach our children! I don’t believe that heaven and earth has passed away yet…and ALL has not yet been fulfilled…the Lord has not returned yet! But yes, we do have freedom through Jesus Christ! Still, God says for us to be HOLY even as He is HOLY! As Christians, we are to be a separate people,a HOLY people, living in the world but not of the world! What tattoos say to those that are in the world is that you are just like them! If you want to look like, and act like the world then why become a Christian?? God tells us to NOT act like the heathen! Come out of the world and be a HOLY people! Did Jesus cut himself? Did Jesus print any marks upon himself??
When I was in the world, I acted just like others in the world(I spake as a child). But I chose to ask the Lord to come into my life…into my heart and I became a new creature! Over time, the Holy Spirit began to teach me and change my sinful heart, mind & soul. The things that I had already done to my body (now – the temple of the Lord) I can not change. But I have the choise NOW that I have accepted the LIFE of Christ in me to be HOLY just as HE IS HOLY! That means with joy I accept His commandments for myself, to live as Jesus would live and obey God’s word. I hope I can be the example to my children that Jesus was to all generations to come. Would you also write graffiti on the walls of the sanctuary? Yes, it is only a building…but it has been set aside to be a HOLY place where we go to worship our God and our most holy SAVIOR! Ask my son the definition of sancutary. Now he is 22 and he has great respect for the body of Christ and His sancturary. He plays music (sax, clarinet, piano, etc.) for two churches in Atlanta and he is a really cool young man. He loves to serve the Lord…he has a wonderful witness for the Lord to other young people and he has NO TATOOS!
Key to studying scripture Context, Context, Context.
We have one line, Lev. 19:28, about marking the body in the Levitical Law in context to Jewish nation not copying rituals of pagan culture in wilderness and in Promise Land. Laws on clothing, grooming, diet, provision for poor, specific to Jewish nation. It is stretch to apply it to the Church today, one made based on bias in today’s culture.
Point of the law was to show nation that they were not holy, could never live a holy life, and needed forgiveness and a messiah.
Christ life demonstrated to the “religious” of his day that it is not about religion but about relationship. By living a life not violating a single regulation in the Law Christ fulfilled it and his resurrection brought it to an end.
New Testament made it pretty clear (if you use common since and study scripture in context, context, context) which laws were cultural pertaining to the Jewish nation BC and which moral aspects of the OT law carried over after Christ resurrection to the church.
Tattoos, body piercing, etc. are issues for modern day Pharisees to debate over. As a pastor my tats, motorcycle, clothing gives me an in to share the Gospel with a group that most of the people writing against tats on this forum try to avoid and have no voice with.
Now if you want one think long and hard before you put something on your body that is permanent. I spent over three years researching designs and placement before putting my first tat, a crown of thorns, around my ankle. And I spent three hours witnessing to the artist and everyone in the shop while I was getting inked.
If you don’t like tats, don’t get one. If you are under age 18 or living at home and your parents don’t want you to get one then respect their wishes. When you are old enough and can financially support yourself then you can think about getting a tat. Like most issues the “church” waste valuable time and resources hashing out these topics.
Comment by Bard June 17, 2009 @ 11:57 pmI say why get a tattoo anyway? Seems like everyone is sporting one or one hundred; Especially the basketball players. Why be a copy cat? The authenic self is what is everlasting.
Comment by Sarah June 18, 2009 @ 8:03 am